Skip to content
3D Printing Certification

LEGO 3D printing takedowns: a law firm responds and LEGO replies


“Everything is not awesome” is how just one admirer responded to new LEGO takedown notices issued to the 3D printing certification neighborhood.

3D Printing certification Sector has now acquired a reply from LEGO and even further insight into the condition from an intellectual assets regulation pro.

Responses from the 3D printing certification maker group have been different, ranging from confusion about what LEGO is saying has been infringed to disappointment that the company seems not to support creative imagination.

Hoping to achieve some clarity, we arrived at out to LEGO once more by telephone and email to see if they wished to answer some of the lots of thoughts circulating on-line and what popular YouTuber the 3D Printing certification Professor describes as “takedown devoid of representation”. 

Precisely, we hoped to locate out:

Why has LEGO issued DMCA* takedown notices in opposition to platforms and folks sharing fan artwork made about Lego?

What would LEGO think about to be a truthful use of the brand name by a fan?

Is LEGO worried about the chilling outcome of issuing such takedown notices?

What does LEGO believe that will be the effects on how followers perceive the brand after the issuance of these takedown notices?

Will LEGO be reconsidering the recent takedown notices?

Though not addressing our concerns immediately Jonas Søndergård, Global Press Officer, The LEGO Group, Company Communications did give a quick assertion. Søndergård discussed that though LEGO would not discuss particulars, the the latest infringement notices were “to secure the lengthy-expression unique rights of the LEGO trademarks, copyrights and patents.”

LEGO states that issuing takedown notices and problems is vital to make sure that the “LEGO wordmark or IP secured elements” does not erode more than time. LEGO’s “Honest Enjoy Coverage” describes a number of guidelines on how the corporation would like to be referred to, and what it deems permissible by enthusiasts. For instance, “If the LEGO trademark is utilized at all, it should always be utilised as an adjective, not as a noun. For case in point, say “MODELS Created OF LEGO BRICKS”. Never ever say “MODELS Crafted OF LEGOs”. 

Nonetheless, does this maintain water?

A clearly bogus Lego found by Reddit user Bungicraft.
A obviously bogus Lego located by Reddit person Bungicraft.


An pro responds to the LEGO takedowns

I questioned Michael Weinberg, Govt Director of the Engelberg Centre on Innovation Legislation & Plan at NYU Law for his thoughts on the LEGO takedowns. Weinberg is especially effectively put to examine this matter. He is the previous Common Counsel and IP Pro at Shapeways, is a board member of the Open Supply Components Association and spent about 50 % a 10 years with General public Understanding, “a non-profit Washington, D.C.-dependent general public fascination group that is concerned in mental house legislation, competition, and option in the digital market.” 

Weinberg believes that the takedowns, “could be a bit of a stretch on the section of Lego for some of the styles qualified.” He continues, “While Lego has a trademark in the expression ‘Lego,’ that does not give them the right to end all employs of that word.”

“People are commonly free of charge to use a term like ‘Lego’ in purchase to show that a design is suitable with Lego bricks as extensive as their use does not produce confusion that the person’s model truly will come from Lego. This is genuine even if the product is becoming bought commercially.

Lego also does not have rights in the essential shape of Lego-type bricks, or the ability to block people from producing new products that are appropriate with formal Lego bricks.” 

Weinburg also notes that an exciting ingredient of the LEGO takedowns is the mixture of trademark and copyright issues. An earlier interview with Weinberg and many other professionals on 3D printing certification and intellectual residence discusses these subject areas.  

Upcoming go for the 3D printing certification community?

Repeated references to the “LEGO wordmark” has led to a group dialogue about how greatest to explain 3D designs or enthusiast artwork without the need of falling foul of LEGO’s legal team. Substitute descriptions for interlocking bricks include things like PoCoBrick (Preferred Construction Brick) and 3DGO.

MyMiniFactory has invited the 3D printing certification neighborhood to make tips to “help make superior options for indie designers and models to function alongside one another as a type of co-creation” on a new blog article. The 3D file sharing system is also managing a level of competition entitled, #BeyondTheBrick.

MyMiniFactory Beyond the brick competition.
MyMiniFactory Outside of the brick competitiveness.

Enable us know your thoughts. You can adhere to us on Twitter below and obtain our free each day 3D printing certification publication listed here. Wanting for a vocation in the 3D printing certification sector? The 3D Printing certification Business work opportunities website is cost-free for enterprises and people. 

Highlighted picture reveals a evidently bogus Lego item discovered by Reddit user Bungicraft.

*These issues have been sent to Lego just before 3DPI had found the takedown notices. Possessing seen the notices, we realize that DMCA is not referenced by name.